Categories: Communication

by sync


Categories: Communication


By Chris Sheesley

“What I hear you saying is … stop parroting what I’m saying!”

Anyone motivated to read this article already knows active listening skills through exposure to it in training and books. Yet, if you’re like most people, you find it strangely distasteful to be either the giver or receiver of active listening technique. Nine out of 12 times it registers as insincere, patronizing or like the person using it is an insufferable undergraduate at Active Listening University.

What’s worse is the preceding clumsiness only emerges if you can remember your lessons from Active Listening 101. When the conversation becomes fiery, your brain tends to bypass the synapses capable of constructing flawless “I statements” and arrives instead at an ancient, reptilian place where self-preservation and blamelessness reign. No wonder active listening smells funny.
Ginseng belongs to the Araliaceae family viagra canadian pharmacy of plants and is a slow growing perennial plant consisting of fork-shaped fleshy roots. Educational reforms transformations are often viagra tablet view for more info now undertaken in a rushed atmosphere, with a dozen different initiatives going on simultaneously. The effect of this supplement is affect so levitra tabs fast. Here are some that tend to cause problems, order cheap viagra vegetable juices, peppers, chilies, onion, garlic, and tomato products.

So, what’s a well-meaning communicator like you supposed to do when you find yourself in the fray? As a conflict facilitator who’s witnessed thousands of tense, face-to-face conflict conversations, my advice revolves around one insight: Just be curious. At some point in the conversation—preferably earlier than later—ask yourself why your opponent sees the situation as he or she does. What does this disagreement look like from his or her foothold in the universe? To clarify, I’m not talking about the “Why the heck does she think that?!” brand of curiosity, but the “Wouldn’t it be fascinating to know why she sees it so differently” type. Happily, this mindset is both plausible and actionable because you actually already are curious; you’re just clever at masking it.

Once you tap into curiosity, step two is to demonstrate and quench your curiosity any way you choose. Technique becomes subordinate to real inquisitiveness. If your interest inspires you to summarize, clarify and validate emotions, then those formerly stilted techniques are transformed into meaningful queries and genuine dialogue. My clients who find it in themselves to ask real questions and strive to ensure they actually understand the other always have an easier time navigating out of discord. In the end, it’s not active listening that stinks but our collective failure while in the cauldron of conflict to infuse it with real wonderment.

Chris Sheesley puts derailed workplace relationships back on track. Senior managers and HR professionals hire Chris when they recognize the need for an experienced, objective facilitator to transform high-stakes or seemingly impossible internal disputes into cooperation and employee efficiency. With 22 years of full time experience, a client roster of hundreds of notable organizations and a track record of over 1,500 cases, Chris is among the most seasoned conflict management professionals in the Northwest. He has amassed over 5,000 hours of experience teaching dispute resolution and related skills grounded in his real-world experience. More about Chris Sheesley’s services

Related Posts

  • By Susan de la Vergne Technical presentations are fabulous examples of public speaking! Engineering and tech presenters are funny, concise, and engaging. Most of them can’t wait to grab a microphone, fire up their succinct, well-designed PowerPoint slides and launch into an hour or two of riveting information transfer!

  • By Susan de la Vergne Bullet lists on slides are nothing more than the presenter's speaker notes. That's it; that’s all they are! The words, ideas, details, facts that the presenter is standing there saying are right there, verbatim, on the screen.

  • By Susan de la Vergne Once upon a time, people thought of reason and emotion as opposites. One is rational, the other irrational. One is ordered, the other chaotic. One is controlled, the other runs wild.

  • By Susan de la Vergne In the 1960’s, the brilliant and sarcastic mathematician-turned-comedian, Tom Lehrer, once went off on a short tirade about interpersonal communication. Yes, it was as hot a topic 45 years ago as it is now. In his rant Mr. Lehrer observed, “One problem that recurs more and more frequently these days in books and plays and movies is the inability of people to communicate with the people they love—husbands and wives who can’t communicate, children who can’t communicate with their parents, and so on.”